Reeking of destruction


Well, we failed to wreak havoc with last week's quiz πŸ™ƒ Despite the fact that the phrase is sometimes written as "wreck havoc," 80% of you got the right answer.

"Wreck havoc" is an understandable mistake, because both "wreck" and "havoc" mean "destruction." But, using that logic with the verb "wreck," which means "to damage," "wreck havoc" means to damage destruction. "Wreak," meanwhile, means "to bring about," hence "wreak havoc."

You didn't need the bonus points, but some of you replied to us anyway and identified the potential eggcorn in last week's newsletter: "sew the seeds," which was correctly written as "sow the seeds."

We're trying something a little different in this week's quiz:

❀ Team Stylebot

Get a free wireless charger πŸ”Œ

Have friends who'd love this newsletter too? Give them your unique referral link (below) and get a bamboo wireless charger when they subscribe.

[RH_REFLINK GOES HERE]

Twitter Linkedin Email
See how many referrals you have

πŸ’Œ A tip a week

If someone forwarded you this email, subscribe here to get one writing tip a week in your inbox.

πŸ’¬ Get reliable, ethical writing advice at your fingertips

Improving your writing means making better choices every day. Stylebot makes it easy with our Slack, Teams and Google Chrome extensions. Try Stylebot for free today.

πŸ“ About Stylebot

Stylebot helps media professionals save time without sacrificing quality by answering editing questions on Slack, Microsoft Teams and Google Chrome. We're on a mission to make editing faster, easier and more fun ✨ Learn more about Stylebot or follow us Instagram, X or LinkedIn.

Get a tip, give a tip

If Stylebot's newsletter has made a difference in your work, or you just love it, show your appreciation with a tip.

​

Stylebot

Hone your writing skills and never use "hone in" again. Get writing tips, have fun with words and learn something new in a one-minute read each week by signing up for Stylebot’s newsletter.

Read more from Stylebot

We don't often think of chairs as being deep. But roots? Absolutely. And therein lies the confusion between "deep-seated" and "deep-seeded." But most of you weren't fooled by last week's quiz β€” almost 60% of you knew the phrase is "deep-seated." So how did "deep-seeded" get planted (πŸ˜‰) in our minds? Well, for starters, the two phrases sound alike. Plus, "seeded" makes sense in this context. It's a classic eggcorn, a misheard phrase that sometimes makes logical sense. Some other eggcorn...

We had a tie in last week's quiz about how to punctuate the term commonly used for carved pumpkins, with 35% of you choosing "jack o'lanterns" and another 35% choosing "jack-o'-lanterns." So who's right? Let's ask Stylebot πŸ˜‰ It's tedious, but we put the hyphens and an apostrophe in jack-o'-lantern. Another common format is "jack-o-lantern." "Jack o'lantern" is much less common. So who is Jack? And what's he doing with a lantern? Here's where we tell you what carved pumpkins and marsh gas have...

If you chose "pouring over" in last week's quiz, did you associate the act of studying intently with poor posture? Perhaps pore and pour's fellow homophone can help you remember the correct phrase. Almost everyone who took last week's quiz correctly identified "pour" as the verb to use for serving drinks. But nearly a third of you chose "pouring over" for the act of studying the audit logs, when the correct phrase is poring over. When you hear the phrase "poring over," you might picture...