|
The end of the year is approaching, which means it's wrap season. Gift wrapping, sure, but also the time of year when we get wrap-ups of our habits and behaviors. If you answered our quiz questions this year, you can pat yourself on the back: There were only a few questions that a majority of quiz respondents got wrong. Great work 👏 We're wrapping up our quiz series with a look back at those trickier questions and reviewing the lessons, starting with the one that tripped up the most people: nerve-racking, not "nerve-wracking." Here are the results of that quiz: Here's how we broke it down when we first covered this phrase more than two years ago: Rack is a word with many definitions. By lexicographer Bryan A. Garner's count, it has nine meanings as a noun and seven as a verb. And while a rack might end up everywhere from your closet to your dinner plate, it is also an instrument of torture 😬 Thus, as a verb, "rack" can mean to torture or stretch, which leads us to two common phrases and another noun and verb with overlapping meanings: wrack. The phrases nerve-racking and rack your brain are often written as "nerve-wracking" and "wrack your brain." The confusion is understandable, given that "rack" and "wrack" are sometimes used interchangeably. But usage manuals are pretty united on the phrases "nerve-racking" and "rack your brain": Don't use the "w." You'll find more varied advice on how to use "wrack" on its own. Like "rack," it has quite a few meanings, including both "destruction" and "seaweed." And fun fact: Those definitions aren't as far apart as they might seem, as "wrack" evolved from a word meaning "shipwreck." Are you racking your brain to figure out which quiz question we'll review next week? If you have a guess, hit reply and let us know. ❤ Team Stylebot
💌 A tip a weekIf someone forwarded you this email, subscribe here to get one writing tip a week in your inbox. 💬 Get reliable, ethical writing advice at your fingertipsImproving your writing means making better choices every day. Stylebot makes it easy with our Slack, Teams and Google Chrome extensions. Try Stylebot for free today. 📝 About StylebotStylebot helps media professionals save time without sacrificing quality by answering editing questions on Slack, Microsoft Teams and Google Chrome. We're on a mission to make editing faster, easier and more fun ✨ Learn more about Stylebot or follow us Instagram, X or LinkedIn.
|
Hone your writing skills and never use "hone in" again. Get writing tips, have fun with words and learn something new in a one-minute read each week by signing up for Stylebot’s newsletter.
Quick, without looking anything up, can you tell if the following sentences are correct? ❓A monarch takes the reins at the start of her reign. ❓He had free reign to develop new strategies. ❓After more than a decade on the job, she knew how to hold the reins during times of chaos. One of those sentences contains a phrase that was the subject of one of the closest quizzes we did in 2025. And if you spotted the incorrect sentence, you know which phrase it is. We had covered reign and rein in...
All right, now that you've *just* gotten used to writing "2026" instead of "2025," quick question: Is it EST or EDT when you're writing a time zone? Luckily, this time of year doesn't add more confusion to writing the time and date. When we asked you about time zones in the spring, you were split on whether to use "EST" or "EDT": At the time, the correct answer was "EDT." Here's more from our newsletter revealing the answer: In time zone abbreviations, the "S" stands for "standard," and the...
Happy 2026! Even though it's a new year, we're continuing the wrap-up of our quiz series with the answers to our trickiest questions. Before the holiday break, we reviewed the phrase nerve-racking. Now, we're onto whoever vs. whomever. Well, that was the fill-in-the-blank in the quiz question. But the lesson is really about subjects and objects and noun clauses. Here's the question that tripped up most of you: So "whomever" is the correct answer there, but it's not as simple as just using...