A couple of verbs


We did two newsletters last year on was vs. were to cover a couple of different grammatical rules: collective nouns and the subjunctive mood. And while you didn't struggle on the subjunctive mood quiz, "couple" proved trickier:

"Was" won out on the newsletter quiz, but when we posted the same question on LinkedIn, we got the opposite response. There are more than a couple of ways to use "couple." One is that it's essentially a collective noun meaning a set of romantic partners, but even then, the verb choice varies. Here's how we resolved the question last year:

The short answer is that it's not always correct to use "was" with "couple," nor is it always correct to use "were." It depends on the context.

Here's how we explain it in Stylebot's style guide entry: Are you writing about the couple doing something together or to each other, or are you referring to them as a unit?

Most of the time, it's the former. The sentence in last week's quiz is similar to the one in our style guide, which reads: "The couple were married for five years before they decided to divorce." So our answer is "were."

However, it's not wrong to use "was." You could make a case that they're acting as a unit in a marriage. But they've each decided to join together to create a unit, and only when they do things together as that unit should you use singular verbs. Here's the example sentence in our style guide: "Each couple is bringing a casserole to the party."

All right, you can pat yourself on the back, because this is the end of our close-call quiz reviews. You performed well on all the other quizzes last year, but you can always let us know if there's something else you'd like us to review.

❤ Team Stylebot

Get a free wireless charger 🔌

Have friends who'd love this newsletter too? Give them your unique referral link (below) and get a bamboo wireless charger when they subscribe.

[RH_REFLINK GOES HERE]

Twitter Linkedin Email
See how many referrals you have

💌 A tip a week

If someone forwarded you this email, subscribe here to get one writing tip a week in your inbox.

💬 Get reliable, ethical writing advice at your fingertips

Improving your writing means making better choices every day. Stylebot makes it easy with our Slack, Teams and Google Chrome extensions. Try Stylebot for free today.

📝 About Stylebot

Stylebot helps media professionals save time without sacrificing quality by answering editing questions on Slack, Microsoft Teams and Google Chrome. We're on a mission to make editing faster, easier and more fun ✨ Learn more about Stylebot or follow us Instagram, X or LinkedIn.

Get a tip, give a tip

If Stylebot's newsletter has made a difference in your work, or you just love it, show your appreciation with a tip.

Stylebot

Hone your writing skills and never use "hone in" again. Get writing tips, have fun with words and learn something new in a one-minute read each week by signing up for Stylebot’s newsletter.

Read more from Stylebot

If you waited with bated breath last week for the Ides of March to pass, you can thank Shakespeare. We already told you that he gets the credit for the lasting power of the Ides of March as a bad omen. He's also responsible for keeping bait's homophone "bate" around in another enduring phrase. We don't use "bate" very much anymore, but it came about in the 1300s to mean "to diminish" (and yes, its origins are tied to a shorter version of "abate," which is still commonly used today)....

Today is Friday the 13th, the second one of the year. And if today's association with bad luck isn't enough for you, then look no further than Sunday's bad omen: the Ides of March. So what do we make of these two inauspicious days? The origins of Friday the 13th being unlucky are hard to pin down, though Christianity and Norse mythology regard 13 as an unlucky number of dinner guests, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica. Britannica also points to other biblical references that regard Friday...

If you've been watching hockey this season or you're gearing up for this year's World Cup, you're likely familiar with the term hat trick. And if you're not, here you go: It's when one player scores three goals in one game. It's commonly associated with hockey and soccer, but it can apply to other sports, as well as to a series of three victories. But there are no hats in soccer, and hockey players wear helmets. So why the "hat"? "Hat trick" made its sports debut in cricket. When a bowler...